where an apologists wastes so many words to show his ignorance.
Atheism is a lack of belief in gods [deities]. It says nothing about why we think pink is pink or why cows are yellow. Nothing at all.
The OP is numbered and so my response will follow the same numbering
1. what is faith? atheists certainly have it.
I believe this is true. I believe strongly that if there is any truth, the only way to arrive at it is through reason. We have no other way to arrive at judgments except through reason. It is not an issue of faith to say when I die, am dead. I have no reason to suspect otherwise.
2. from evolution
The religious person who believes Adam and Eve were created as adult beings cannot believe in any form of evolution. It would be an absurd position to believe in a god guided evolution and god’s perfect creation.
3. from the big bang
There is no evidence from the BB cosmology of an agent, divine, intelligent or what have you starting it. Besides if the theists spent more time reading than praying he would know the BB theory talks about Planck time after the beginning of inflation. We have no way of knowing what was before that, if there was ever a before.
I may hasten to add here that I don’t know how the universe came to be, if it did come to be.
4. From incomprehensible chance on a biological level:
this is the argument from design in a new formulation. It doesn’t hold.
5. From natural order:
Let’s pause a moment. Is order a property of a thing or is it our way of looking at things? Any argument from order is misguided. The same way any argument from beauty would be.
and if the theist did read more than pray, he would know that this claim
It therefore taken on blind faith by the atheist that tomorrow nature will operate in the same uniform manner that it did today, he cannot simply assume that it will.
had been covered ages ago by D. Hume when he challenged the inferences from causation. We however have no reason to suspect that nature would act differently than it did yesterday. However, if we believe in a miracle-working god, he might just stop the sun to help some christian win a war or bomb an abortion clinic or he could be helping the IS somewhere. We can never know, for the universe depends on his caprice.
6. That one-day science will explain everything:
Accuse me of scientism if you wish, but unless you can show your other ways of knowing, fuck off! No matter how many days we fast or how long our prayers, we will never know the answer to 1+1
7. That life comes from non-life:
The theist believes his god created everything ex nihilo. Why would they find it difficult to accept that life could come from non life if it can come from nothing?
8. That their thoughts have value:
My lack of belief in gods says nothing about the value of my thoughts. This is a silly argument.
9. From miracles:
What are miracles?
10. From fine tuning
Of all silly arguments, this strikes me as the one most beloved by lunatics. What would the scientists have compared the present universe to arrive at the conclusion that life wouldn’t be possible if the values were different?
In conclusion, this theist could have spent more time reading his bible than fiddling with things beyond his pay grade.