Pretending for a moment that he lived, yes, all organic things die. To believe otherwise is to be either ignorant or ignorant.
When a christcultist writes that Jesus died so we could receive forgiveness is, to me, for lack of a better word thinking with the ass.
Anyone who thinks an animal or a person had to die to pay for their infractions has lost the use of their reason.
The question the godcultist must give an answer for is, why would an omniscient god, knowing full well the outcome of creating humans, go ahead and create them? It must have known it will have to die at some stage and that we would still go on a killing, so why do it?
Whoever Mac is, there is nothing wrong with recovering from a delusion. In fact, it is to be encouraged. So Mac, whether he Mitch’s fiction or a real guy, bravo to you for waking from the delusion.
Well at least when Jesus died, he didn’t demand that a bunch of his followers etc be buried alive with him to serve him in the after life. I have been reading about some religious cults doing that. We’ve come a long way, baby. 😉
LikeLike
We sure have come a long way. Think of it, I think we have gone back several steps
LikeLiked by 1 person
Honestly, I try not to think of it. lol
LikeLike
good for you dear friend.
every time i try to think of it, i get headaches
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a fascinating Italian musical project, Spiritual Front, that did a musical piece called “Letter from Guyana” in which they incorporate a recording from the good Reverend Jim Jones giving a sermon immediately prior to the mass suicide in Jonestown.
. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVDOImMY9B8
LikeLiked by 1 person
as one of many strange parts of a strange story, if JC had to die as a savior, why wait some unknown thousands of years after “eden” to send the supposed actual solution to “original sin”?
LikeLike
good question.
why had the sin to be left to worsen?
LikeLike
As humans we like to let others “stew in their own juices” We like to see others suffer a bit before coming to their rescue.
But then god/jesus aren’t human ……. so why did they wait so long???
LikeLike
And will he die a second and third time? It appears the first dying did not improve the lot of believers. They are daft, they suffer, they are full of guilt
LikeLiked by 2 people
And in their daftness and suffering, they oppress (and kill) others. Even other believers.
LikeLike
All in the name of love
LikeLike
As Jesus said, My ways are not your ways and My thoughts are not your thoughts. We are just people…people he created. You cannot possibly understand the mind of God. That is why we have faith. Knowing that God is incapable of anything bad and will ONLY do what is best for us. We have to have faith that that is what is taking place in times of adversity. Remember, Satan was given the world to rule. But we do not have to be a part of that world and be ruled by him, but instead be ruled by the one who loves us, Jesus.
LikeLike
Hey Christine, hope you are having a pleasant weekend.
Jesus, if he existed, created nothing. How can you know god is incapable of anything bad when you can’t know the mind of god?
If Satan was given the world to rule, then ultimately it is god’s problem not ours. Let them settle their differences elsewhere
LikeLike
as a christian, i never asked the question of whether god could have chosen to just forgive on the basis of repentance alone… requiring no human or ‘human/divine’ sacrifice at all.
i guess if it were his shooting match to begin with, he could. I never asked the next question either. Why didn’t he is he could have? -KIA
LikeLiked by 1 person
why would anyone need to repent? If god is powerful, no one can do what god doesn’t will them to do
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wasn’t deterministic. I still don’t believe that we don’t have free will, albeit as part of our natural organism now vs gift of the biblical god
LikeLike
So, for argument sake, god created everything good and from somewhere a being less powerful created evil and god was powerless to intervene or how does this freewill work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
at work right now. i’ll have to reply later. sorry
LikeLike
No problem KIA. Do what you must
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just traded some will for some peanut butter. So, rather than free will, I now have peanut butter will, on a cracker, too. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I want to start stocking wills. I think they have a market
LikeLiked by 1 person
christians would blame the fall of man. adam wanted a snack and listened to that darned woman. the rest is all our fault.
the biblical god is not all powerful
LikeLike
Ah I see. So it’s our fault. Basically saying we are our own work. Where does the idea of an all powerful god then originate?
LikeLike
I can only REM one specific vs that defines God as omnipotent, even though you are right. It’s Christian doctrine. That would be in one of the Timothy letters or Titus. But having left the faith, I have a feeling the teaching not biblical but a mixture from Platonism (?)
LikeLike
In the context of limited human beings, sure.
But this is an Omnipresent, Omniscient, Omnipotent being outside of our puny conceptions of time and space. How can there be much meaning associated with such a thing as “free will” for an entity which is everywhere and in all times?
LikeLike
omnipresence and omnipotence do not imply necessarily actual control or determination of all things
LikeLike
What do they imply?
That he can want to be in my cistern and chose not to be or he can will something and it doesn’t actualize?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“He died to save us from us!” The “us” he created and KNEW he’d have to die for in the guise of his own son. Yeah. These people need to be pitied and placed in a mental hospital. Massive doses of anti-psychotic drugs would help, too. The stench of methane rises from my computer every time I read this crap.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Do you think they read the posts aloud to themselves?
And if you see the yesers on hus blog you may almost begin to doubt your sanity
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read some of them. Crazy, mindlessness.
LikeLike
Mindless is, I think, very appropriate
LikeLike
Just for the record, Makagutu, you have not accurately represented the ideas presented in my post. And last time I checked, my brain was still soundly ensconced in my skull. It is possible to disagree without resorting to insults. Have a great week.
LikeLike
Where have I misrepresented your ideas?
Have a pleasant week
LikeLike
You misrepresent because you do not accept and agree. To disagree with the christian, to say he’s wrong, is the equivalent of name calling and trampling on their rights. See, though the christian god is considered to be powerful, the christian himself is not. His skin is very thin, and to say he is wrong is to throw punches into his privy parts. It’s all good, however. Because, to the ultra-sensitive christian, you are nothing but fodder for the fires of hell which god has prepared for your non-believing self. Have a great eternity, you non-believing, questioning fool you. $Amen$ And please, refrain from misrepresenting and insulting any more ultra-sensitive christians. You’re trampling on their rights when you do.
Now for a quote: “I created you. I got angry with you. I came to earth and, masochistically, committed suicide in a horrible, brutal way. Then, I came back and nothing changed. I still don’t like you. That’s why I built hell. Now, the three of me are off to Taco Bell for dinner. Even though there’s but one of me, I eat for three. My meds have worn off and the voices have returned. ‘Bye.” Yahweh, circa 2003.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Is it three of you or one of you? I don’t understand.
The Christian believes his god powerful but insists on apologetics. Strange these people are
LikeLike
And very hyper sensitive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did I offend you? Where is the offering basket
LikeLike
I gave at the bar.
LikeLike
https://whyevolutionistrue.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/2016-03-30.png#038;h=551?strip=all&quality=65&resize=936,936 you may like this.
Very timely
LikeLike
Very funny.
LikeLike
Mak, I only just now saw your response to my comment. Regarding your question, “Where have I misrepresented your ideas?” You have done so with both of the ideas you attribute to me: 1) “a christcultist (me, presumably) writes that Jesus died so we could receive forgiveness” (I did not say this, nor does not accurately represent what I did say; 2) “Anyone (referring to me, presumably) who thinks an animal or a person had to die to pay for their infractions has lost the use of their reason.” I did not say this, neither do I believe it.
I am, by the way, an ex-atheist. I don’t expect to win you over with a handful of comments (either heated or dispassionate), nor, I’m sure, do you expect that of me, so this will be my last for now. Best, Mitch
LikeLike
Christcultists refers to anyone who claim, as you do, they follow christ. You said this
How is what I have said a misrepresentation?
So your saying that he was the final sacrifice is not what you believe? So what do you actually believe?
Ah, the ex atheist claim. I will take you at your word. So what happened? Your girlfriend jilted you? Or you were addicted to porn and couldn’t help it?
I am always open to persuasion, I could be wrong in my beliefs and I think there nothing wrong with trying to correct my bad ways.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mitch, you have every opportunity to list the ideas I have not presented correctly.
If your brain is still in your skull, by all means use it.
It is possible to disagree without resorting to insults. I do this all the time with reasonable people. Using your post as a barometer, I doubt your reasonableness. You think your friend Mac, not me of course, isn’t justified in challenging what he used to believe and then to impress the madhouse you run, you tell them you have learnt what to forgive is in Greek like it changes the fact that the said sacrifice you are proud of is barbaric.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read bis post. Yet another indoctrinated half-wit who has no understanding of the history of his religion, or desires to have any either.
As everything is about JC shedding blood I wonder how he feels with the view recently raised that perhaps Jesus was not actually nailed to a cross, but tied?
LikeLike
Damn. That would take even longer to die. Gotta give it to those Romans. They knew how to make a point.
LikeLike
Have they solved the issue of his existence? Or they have left that as a hot potato as they say here?
LikeLike
Solved? Yeah right! 🙂
LikeLike
Mak, when I was applying for admission to a theological seminary I explained it in the following way:
So within the Christian worldview there is a logic to the cross.
I think that the greater weakness of the argument of the cross is that Jesus spending three hours there covers the ‘sins’ of all humanity. It seems a bit lopsided, especially if one concludes that those who don’t ‘accept’ Jesus are sent to ‘God’s’ torture chamber for all eternity.
LikeLike
I am afraid, Peter, there is no logic to this still. If the Christian god is omniscient and omnipresent, it is in the presence of sin and knows about it everywhere at all times. The only time an argument that in its presence sin isn’t allowed is if it lived in a particular place at a particular time and then people go to meet with it.
Further, if Jesus were god he was aware he wouldn’t be dead long. How is that a sacrifice? It’s a play where the actors are sons of virgins and dreamers
LikeLike
Mak please note I said that logic is based on adopting the Christian worldview.
For those who are able to adopt that worldview it is a bit like living in a parallel universe, which in essence can be defined as, everything associated with God is good and perfect, everything else is corrupt and has no worth to it.
Having said all this, Christian theologians can’t actually agree among themselves the finer details of the logic of the Cross. But these finer details tend to be way too deep for the majority of Christians to even consider.
The real theological issue arises from where Jesus describes his death as a ‘ransom’. But a ransom paid to whom? Some say ‘God’ others the ‘Devil’.
LikeLike
In this case, the only way this can even be logical, is as you say, they live in a parallel universe.
LikeLike
The cross is foolishness to those who are perishing (1 Corinthians 1:18), Mak, in my Christian opinion, you are perishing (spiritually), thus to you the cross and all it represents is foolishness. I will not bother with a theological argument, It is foolishness to you and foolish of me to attempt to persuade you to the Christian worldview; but, I will pray that someone, somewhere, someday, will provide the answers you seek and you will trust Christ as your savior. .
LikeLike
Be wary of the christian lying to you that his religion is a true path to God. There is no God but Allah, and Mohammad is His Prophet. From the Koran: 3:85: “And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.”
The christain is a snake, the Great Satan, the enemy of Truth, and the enemy of God. Trust in God alone to save and protect you, and cover your ears when the great christian deceiver speaks, for listening to him is surely the pathway to Hell. Allahu Akbar
LikeLike
What would we do without the Koran?
Thanks friend for this timely reminder that the Koran is the holy word of god, and Allah is his name.
LikeLike
No trouble. That’s why I’m here.
LikeLike
Hi Patrick, in my opinion, you have perished [mentally] and thus to you reason is foolishness and common sense is what others have but you don’t.
I am not looking for answers, not for your Christ anyway. That boat sailed.
Thanks for taking time to read and comment.
LikeLike
“When you believe in things that you don’t understand, then you suffer.
Superstition ain’t the way.” ~Stevie Wonder
LikeLike
You are missing the entire point. People die. Jesus died. So what??? It isn’t that he just died. He died a sacrificial death. He took our sin and our punishment. He rose from the dead to vindicate his sacrifice and offer us eternal life. The offer of eternal life is free. All you need to do is accept it. It seems foolish to walk away from this free gift. But it is your choice. If you are really interested in a rational investigation, I would suggest reading Augustine’s Confessions and C S Lewis’ Mere Christianity.
LikeLike
Ted, I can only conclude two things either you haven’t read anything other than the books you mention here or you have and are dumb.
LikeLiked by 1 person