Over at Nate’s, there is discussion going on regarding questions UncleE thinks are problematic to an atheistic worldview.
First, I have been reliably informed by my friends atheism has no content other than a lack of belief in deities, whatever these are. This is to say, you should give a reason for any position you take. Being an atheist cannot be one of them.
With that introduction, the question posed by UncleE, can be dismissed as not being problematic to atheism.
I will indulge UncleE though. His question
Do we have free will? If so, how? If not how can any choice be based on evidence rather than brain processes?
First, I will mention what Bob said the other day. We cannot have absolutist answers on questions that are not amenable to proof one way or another. I am a freewill skeptic and will remain so till I am convinced otherwise.
I think the question is a false dilemma. Isn’t evaluation of reasonableness a brain process? And how are we to tell that a thing is not a brain process?
This question is not a problem for atheism. To the best of my knowledge, Marvin is an atheist and a compatibilist same as Dennett.
I am hoping UncleE will ask better questions in future.