We are back to our normal programming. We will not answer the question but look forward to hearing your thoughts.
I, on my part, think those asking this question are not living.
We will allow the author to speak.
We are back to our normal programming. We will not answer the question but look forward to hearing your thoughts.
I, on my part, think those asking this question are not living.
We will allow the author to speak.
An Inclusive Site Dedicated to Life-Long Learning
Any thoughts worth writing about
On the lookout for more joy
Observations and reflectionsf
You - philosophical, thoughtful, witty. Me - still thinks fart jokes are funny. We should DEFINITELY get together!
Questioning the conventional wisdom
Everything random... At 3am 😊
These are unedited versions of my thoughts straight from the mind, a relieve from the ‘pressure cooker’, snippets and flotsam of a mundane existence, collected over time, at the early morning hours at sunrise. I have no intensions to start a self-help group or a forum for complains!
Blossoming: A Story of Beauty, Pain, Struggle & Growth
The African Environmental Blog site
The world inside my head is beautiful 🌷🌷
Videos of feral cats on the streets, and my own four feral felines at home, feline humor, advice, and gifts for your cat.
My journey to finding love through the sea Fuckboys
A blog by the Global Governance Centre, Graduate Institute, Geneva
Nicole
Cogito Ergo Sum
Sustainable Living & Wildlife Conservation
Where The Eagles Fly . . . . Art Science Poetry Music & Ideas
One minute info blogs escaping the faith trap
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t…
Mark and Abbie Jury
Life is intuition woven on fickleness.
Life is a journey. Let us meet at the intersection and share a story.
Random musings about everything.
With(out) Predicates
I call architecture frozen music. – Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Only an artist can interpret the meaning of life — Novalis
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sorry, Mak. I agree with you!
The term ‘purpose’ is problematic because it has different meanings. Purpose in the scientific sense seems to me to be an explanation for how the product of function has come about whereas in the philosophical or religious sense it seems to be the best-guessed explanation for why the function serves (or at least indicates) some larger goal. The former is about how life expresses itself and is factual; the latter is about why it expresses itself and is metaphysical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All real scientists know that the meaning of life is The Great Golden Boot. Do as he wants, or get a swift kick in the ass.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We can make purpose and meaning within certain scopes such as evolution or society, but ultimately science tells us it’s all headed toward the heat death of the universe, or the big rip, or some other cosmic anticlimactic ending.
https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-41c530add6e301297d74b9d9482d964c-c
LikeLike
My purpose is to annoy and upset people. I believe I fulfil that purpose well 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very well
You should get a Nobel
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome!
LikeLike
HEY! I’ll be damned if he gets a Nobel before I get mine! Unfair!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We will arrange you both get your Nobel Prizes at the same time
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wasn’t it to make sandwiches?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s just people from an Italian family of the name Panini. Their purpose is to make sandwiches 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
Good question and I, for one, believe that none of us truly know the answer to this eternal question, The author, by his own admission, used some very vague and technical language which, I think, confused the issue instead of clarifying his argument. I trust you’ll offer his second paper? Naked hugs, my Kenyan brother!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hopefully I will find his second paper where he talks sense
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope that you had a very pleasant and relaxing weekend! Naked hugs!
LikeLike
Bejan’s Constructal Law says the reason is a better tomorrow, constant improvement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hope, you recall, is the worst of our punishments. We are always hoping for a better tomorrow against odds
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nietzsche: hope is the greatest of evils for it lengthens the ordeal of man.
LikeLike
Nietzsche was right
LikeLike
I don’t have a purpose.
Items have purpose….cars/bikes/scooters for driving, vacuums for picking up dirt. mops for floors, fridges for food, stoves for cooking…..etc. All non-human things built for purposes.
I didn’t ask to be born, but I’m here, & don’t need anyone telling me I have a purpose……NO, I don’t!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are here and that is a fact. The rest is speculation
LikeLiked by 1 person
The author, Michael E. Price, is attempting to mix hypothetical science with metaphysics. His attempt is both inconsistent with the empirical foundations of science, and an intellectual incongruence of (dare I say it?) biblical proportions. I understand the human desire to see purpose in life, but science is not now the platform to do so because so much of our cosmological origins remain undiscovered. He wrote:
>>> “The truly novel aspect of my Complexity article is the explicit application of adaptationist theory to spell out exactly why life, as the least entropic known thing, is the most likely mechanism of universe replication. It’s not novel, however, to propose in more general terms that life, evolved to a sufficiently intelligent form, might constitute such a mechanism.”
Firstly, the “complexity” of life is a relative concept. Since we have not yet discovered life beyond Earth, we cannot objectively assess how complex it really is. In comparison to extraterrestrial life in the universe or beyond, terrestrial species might be quite simple. We just don’t know. Secondly, Price’s suggestion that “life… is the most likely mechanism of universe replication” (i.e. in a larger multiverse) is pure unadulterated speculation without even a shred of supporting evidence. Such metaphysical musings are not scientific, and should be delegated to the purview of philosophy and/or religion. Price should have ended his article with his first paragraph:
>>> “Does humanity exist to serve some ultimate, transcendent purpose? Conventional scientific wisdom gives the answer as a definitive no. This is the answer provided in this recent New York Times piece ‘The universe doesn’t care about your purpose’, for example, and also by physicist Lawrence Krauss in his latest book. According to Krauss, the fact that we evolved on this planet is just a “cosmic accident”, and people who believe otherwise are probably suffering from some kind of religious delusion.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Superb response, Bob.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you.
LikeLike
There’s NO purpose IN life.
Life itself is a purpose…
The question is, whose…
LikeLiked by 1 person
My good friend, many days no see!
I agree with you and I don’t have an answer to your question.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Robert Byrne said, “The purpose of life is a life of purpose.”
Some say purpose is the destination, living without it is dangerous. While others say, purpose is not just a goal to be achieved, but also an intention to do your best and a desire to feel a certain way.
And to answer your question Moshe Ben Yehuda: My friend, it is better when the purpose is “Ours” than “Mine”.
LikeLike
Good one.
LikeLiked by 1 person