That Nairobi as a city has a traffic congestion problem at almost any time of day and sometimes even at night on some roads is not in doubt. That the clever people, and I use clever loosely, trying to solve it are not very clever is also not in doubt.
A while back, these clever people decided they would magically solve the problem by raising parking fees while not providing alternatives to these people who drive. Raising parking fees would work where other alternatives are reliable and efficient, something Nairobi doesn’t have.
Further evidence that the city fathers are clever, they announced an imposition of two car free days that was to begin last Friday. Well, it didn’t start as I knew it wouldn’t. This is why this pilot was bound to fail from the word go.
They said
Afterwards, private motorists starting February 1, will be required to keep their private vehicles at bay on Wednesday and Saturdays and instead use public service vehicles in a historic piloting phase that is geared at de-congesting the CBD but one that has been met by opposition and equal measure of support.
and here is where the problem starts. Do they keep them at bay at home or can drive them and just don’t get into the CBD. Instead of reducing traffic as these clever people anticipate, there will be chaos. To solve traffic congestion requires several measures among them includes terminal buildings where people can park their cars. Much of the traffic in the CBD is as a result of people trying to find parking bays.
As it is, using public transport (which are actually private taxis) is inefficient and expensive. Any journey through Nairobi requires at least the use of two matatus as non loop around the city. There are areas that are not served at all by public transport forcing residents to walk long distances just to catch a bus, that one never knows what time they will come, how much fare you will pay and whether they nyongoa before they get to the terminal.
In the article I have linked to, the clever city fathers say only cyclists, police vehicles and other emergency vehicles will be allowed on specific roads. Now my friends, this is really stupid. There are no cycling lanes. The roads will not be car free, just the CBD. So does one carry their bikes and only cycle in those specific streets or how did they see this happening?
Anyway, these clever people were elected by Nairobians and as such, kila mtu apambane na hali yake.
That sounds like an absolute madhouse! I’m from a small city where rush hour is about 10 minutes. We have parking almost everywhere, at no charge.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It’s a madhouse and the mad people are in charge.
LikeLiked by 3 people
A sad reality in much of the world as the populations grows and the car fleet grows even quicker.
I live in a relatively small city, around 200,000 people but even here I see politicians failing to grasp the issue and proposing nonsense solutions similar to what you are experiencing.
I like to use the London sewage system from the mid 19th century as an example of how politicians operate:
– stage 1: the problem was clear the sewage system was not coping:
– stage 2: undertake an investigation to decide what to do;
– stage 3: receive the investigation report, and then reject because the solution is too expensive and takes too long:
– stage 4: propose some mickey mouse solutions, which look like you are doing something:
– stage 5: a very hot summer makes the city putrid and even the politicians realise that the mickey mouse solutions are not the answer:
– Stage 6: actually implement what was recommended from stage 2.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You’d think politicians go to the same school
LikeLiked by 2 people
One word to solve everything: Blimps.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I should get two of these
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thousands… For all heavy traffic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There would be a blimp crash if they are many in the air. I need only to get a few my use
LikeLiked by 2 people
No, no, no. Fully autonomous, flying along pre-determined roots using simple radar/radio waves as guide.
LikeLiked by 3 people
that would be nice
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yes, there would be crashes… even with John’s autonomous, radar-guided, self-driving blimps along predetermined “roots” – lol! I hear Tesla is selling software for that on the cheap!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can’t rule accidents especially once there are many blimps in the air
LikeLiked by 2 people
Make sure they are helium filled. The hydrogen filled ones are very combustible. Or, utilize all that hot air expelled by politicians!
LikeLiked by 2 people
It would be nice to have politicians in a hydrogen filled blimp or better still to just lose them
LikeLiked by 3 people
One word answer: Rickshaws.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I like the idea of rickshaws. Green. And fuel efficient
LikeLiked by 4 people
Sadly, this is *NOT* just Nairobi, my Kenyan brother, but a dilemma everywhere – the joys of life in the 21st century! Naked hugs!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Man, Nairobi traffic would leave you depressed on good days
LikeLiked by 4 people
ALL traffic leaves me depressed because invariably everyone seems to always manage to travel in the same direction that I NEED to go! 😦 I guess I should get busy on that “wall” project! 😉 Take care and stay safe and bare!
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s presently too hot to be bare, I may get a sun burn to start with or worse still become bbqed.
I think somehow I have gotten used to bad traffic the people who annoy me are those who change lanes every minute slowing down already slow traffic
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed. We have those idiots here, also. They’re always in a hurry to get to nowhere! 🙂
My Kenyan brother, REMEMBER to use sunscreen! I’ve never had a BBQed Kenyan before! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Goes to buy sunscreen
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great idea! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good gobs of goose manure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. Totally
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is NOT an answer, folks. Our Autosexuality cannot easily be cured. It may be “unfair” to raise fees etc. etc., but it is also “unfair” for the large percentage of Kenyans who are not addicted to moving themselves with three tons of polluting metal to pay the taxes for the massive road construction projects that would be required-and those projects always just generate more traffic anyway (induced demand is real) because once the new freeway is built, I can now move to a nicer and bigger house in a suburb even father away from my job!!!!! At least, that is the American reality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You are right on induced demand. I have seen it here.
The cheapest solution is for everyone to work from home or to ensure there is efficient and reliable public transport.
Curatiba has tried to do something about moving people
LikeLiked by 2 people
People did without cars in the old days. The trick is to have all the things you need in walking distance. The invention of cars created the possibility to have things you need far apart. Small local shops where replaced by distant big mall, for example. We will have to return to small local neighborhoods again where most of the things you need (including your job) can be reached on foot or by bike. Cars are unnecessary. They have been unnecessary for most of human history and will become unnecessary again.
When I lived in the city of Hamburg, I lived in an area where I could walk for shopping. Schools and Kindergardens where between one and three bus stops away. I could go to my workplace on bike and use public transport on days with bad weather. In the end, we sold our car because it was standing around most of the time. This is possible and it is much cheaper than everybody having a car.
LikeLiked by 2 people
But! But! Agenda 21. The UN is coming for our 5,000 pound Suburban Assault Vehicles and we will be unable to buy 48-packs of toilet paper imported from rain forests for CHEAP. This will not DO! Those small shops are expensive. I need MORE AND MORE STUFF cheaper and cheaper!
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I bet you didn’t have a three thousand square foot house with a media room for your household of three!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have seen the fuel guzzlers driven by some UNEP types here and I wonder whether they have read Agenda 21: Our common future or is it the MDGs.
If only carbon bikes would come cheap, I would like to have 2: a roadie and a mountain bike
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think eventually it will be untenable to have so many cars. I would love to live in a place where I can walk or cycle on a daily basis
LikeLiked by 3 people
My city is that way. Everything is within walking distance, or can be easily ridden. We use our mobility scooters because we’re disabled, but we used to walk for everything, from groceries to medical appointments, to going out for dinner, & my husband walked to work every day before retirement.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Are they looking for a lazy bum to immigrate to your city?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Sure, why not!
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is what I mean: https://www.google.de/maps/place/Weidenallee,+20357+Hamburg/@53.5663813,9.9637971,16z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x47b18f446065a0f9:0xc4b11be578b44677!8m2!3d53.5673912!4d9.9648056 You may look around there with street view. There are three train stations, several bus stops (including a night bus), there are shops (small ones as well as supermarkets), schools, doctors etc. Everything one needs in walking distance or only a few stops away. There are bike lanes. There is a big park with a big playground. It is possible to build such places. The trick is to build higher buildings, so a lot of people live on a small surface area. This creates enough customers for local shops. If instead you build single houses surrounded by gardens, the people per area will be few and local shops will become unprofitable. Then you need cars. The pictures shown on street view are about 10 years old, that is when I was living in that area. I have been there last year again, it still looks mostly the same. Many people there still have cars but what I am actually observing among young people now is that a growing number of them don’t have and don’t want a car again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve got the perfect solution for you: pilotless electric air taxis 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
where will everyone park?
LikeLiked by 1 person
They’re taxis. They’ll be in more or less constant use except while being recharged. It’s not like they’ll need to be parked for hours on end while you’re at work or shopping. And being able to maneuver in 3 dimensions should significantly reduce traffic congestion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This would have a chance of working
LikeLiked by 2 people
I might be wrong, but I suspect the algorithms necessary to avoid airborne collisions will be less complex than those required for terrestrial driverless vehicles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My worry is with many of them in the air, and low altitude, such collisions might actually be frequent. It may not be easy to stack them up efficiently and safely
LikeLiked by 2 people
The problem as I see it is that at ground level, the algorithms need to be able to distinguish between moving and fixed objects which can be in very close proximity to the vehicle. At several hundred to more than a thousand metres in the air, there are much fewer object, fixed or moving, and apart from designated landing zones, minimum spacing could be set to a hundred or more metres apart in all directions. I think if I could choose between travelling in a driverless vehicle at ground level or at a thousand metres, I’d choose the latter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d choose the latter too. It definitely has much better views
LikeLiked by 2 people
You know…that is what the promoters of Lyft and Uber said, too. What you get in dense city cores is endless platoons of Uber drivers INCREASING city traffic. I suppose three dimensional travel will be better, but I envision a continuous rain of aircar (and body) parts as the inevitable midair collisions occur.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed, having more taxis in the city doesn’t solve the problem.
LikeLiked by 2 people
NZ cities are not as densely packed as they are in other parts of the world. The city of Auckland covers 1,102.9 sq km (425.8 sq mi). New York covers 783.84 sqkm (302.643 sq mi). Now compare populations: Auckland 1.6 million; New York 8.7 million. NZ cities tend to grow out, not up. Besides the only air traffic would be the air taxis, so there’s no need to look out for idiot drivers (assuming we can solve the drone problem).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Having small populations has its advantages
LikeLiked by 2 people
Having many earthquakes makes it unwise to build upwards so our urban areas sprawl. The sprawl makes the cost of infrastructure expensive, especially public transport. Air taxis simply need the vehicle, nothing like roads or rail to travel on. They are being trialled at present and the developers claim a fleet of the air taxis will be in regular service by 2025. I’m not holding my breath though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think such constrains make people become quite innovative. How do they propose to solve the parking problem and even drift caused by wind drafts?
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s why the testing and trialing it taking place
LikeLiked by 1 person
Public transport problems in Nairobi: A Study of the management and operations of Kenya Bus Services (K.B.S.) Limited
LikeLiked by 1 person