by Stephen Hawking
Is such an interesting read. But after I finished reading it, I am no wiser on what space is, whether time had a beginning and when. But at least I know there is psychological time, thermodynamic time and cosmological time.
Time travel maybe possible but there are paradoxes. If you travel back in time and kill your great great grandfather as a young man, will you born in the future? Unless you travel back in time but with an alternate history, but then where is the fun in this?
Are there singularities like the BBT or not? Does the universe have an edge?
Is determinism true or does the uncertainty principle rule it out completely?
Did god create the universe or rather the initial conditions and left the rest to take its course?
Is faster than light travel possible?
And finally, who was Einstein?
Good questions. Yes, it’s all possible. Considering entanglement and the speed of thought, time travel would be possible but only traveling to a different timeline than our reckoning.
As the universe is older than time, but time does not exist as we know it without it. In other words, more conversation on this topic we have equals less understanding. Circuitism is not our friend.
LikeLike
Is it not a contradiction involved in the claim the universe is older than time? How would we reckon this? Was there a time the universe was but time was not? Is this different from the claim by religiots that god exists out of time and space?
LikeLike
I still can’t figure out why bagels from the grocery aren’t sliced all the way through. Maybe saving time? But for when?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha.
The one thing I don’t understand is why doughnuts have holes. Do we pay for the hole too, or is it free?
LikeLiked by 1 person
We need some add-ons and upgrades to our brains to get around this.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Definitely. A lot of upgrades for that matter
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have not read this, but it looks good. Plus he does a Ted talk about time. It’s a fascinating subject.
http://scriptphd.com/interview/2010/05/12/from-eternity-to-here-with-physicist-sean-carroll/
LikeLike
This I am going to sit down to read later
LikeLike
Faster than light…tachyons
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/can-faster-than-light-tachyons-explain-dark-matter-dark-energy-and-the-big-bang
LikeLike
Wow. Interesting
LikeLike
I did read this long ago and though it may be outdated, he had a very easy to comprehend style of writing and explaining…just food for thought
https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/about-time-einsteins-unfinished-revolution_paul——davies/295905/?mkwid=szsr0BR3r%7cdt&pcrid=70112885352&pkw=&pmt=&plc=&pgrid=21326561472&ptaid=aud-465071891222%3apla-294813787156&gclid=CjwKCAjwy7vlBRACEiwAZvdx9nm3Kb64RcTuvRscdCzngFE0Ntgu9RMBhbTZv1flFSnfXvVGEUnbERoChNQQAvD_BwE#isbn=0684818221&idiq=8340842
LikeLike
This sounds really interesting. I am beginning to feel I walk among giants. I will add to my ever growing list of to read. It never reduces in size!
LikeLike
Robert Heinlein had a wonderful novel called “Door Into Summer” which dealt with the “I am my own grandpaw” conundrum, and I’ve thought about time (which is a Construct, anyway) and it would seem that if you could kill your own ancestor, you couldn’t, because you’d already have never existed in the first place. An entire chunk of backstory would never have happened. =)
LikeLiked by 1 person
So the only way for time travel must be alternate history, I guess.
That must have been an interesting novel
LikeLike
Einstein was the guy who created Einstein’s Bagels, a really good bagel shop here in Chicago. Geez, Mak, do I hafta explain EVERYTHING to you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, just this once.
You know they say you never really know a person. Or something like that. I don’t know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have you read Einstein’s books “The world as I see it” and Out of my later years? I very much enjoyed them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not at all. I will add them to my to read list
LikeLike
On what space is, the other day I read something (or maybe heard it) that physics is not about what things are, but how they relate and interact with each other. Of course, this can get into what the meaning of “is” is. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
When one starts asking questions, they just grow and keep growing
LikeLiked by 1 person
chicagoja has been writing several posts lately expressing his take on the universe/time/etc. I sometimes wonder if he’s trying to compete with Hawking’s viewpoints. If so, he’s going to lose.
BTW, I did read this many years ago. I should consider a re-read but like you, the pile of to-be-read books would probably topple and scatter.
LikeLike
There are too many books to read and too little time. To reread a book would be too demanding though there are a few books I would want to go back to soon
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such questions are immensely fascinating. Why? Because we mostly don’t know the answers and our curiosity compels us. Ignorance is irritating, isn’t it? But, we do know some things.
Time travel into the future isn’t just possible, it is something many of us have already done without realizing it. Every time you fly on a commercial airliner you’re traveling into the future – albeit by a minuscule amount. According to Einstein’s special relativity (a proven theory), the rate of time slows down for things the faster they go. So, from the perspective of a airline passenger or astronaut, people on the ground appear to be aging faster than they are. If one could travel close to the speed of light, this effect would be greatly magnified. Want proof? Our communications satellites and GPS systems could not function without special relativity.
Can we travel into the past? Theoretically, yes. But, it would require transport through structures such as “wormholes” which are still hypothetical. But, what if we solved that technical problem? How could we avoid the “Grandfather Paradox” (i.e. preventing one’s own birth by killing their grandfather in the past)? One hypothetical solution is that the act of killing one’s grandfather, or even the traveling into the past, would create a parallel universe which coexists with the one you left. This idea opens up all sorts of possibilities for the determinism versus free will debate.
According to Einstein’s general relativity, time and space are the same thing which we humans perceive differently. This theory has withstood a century of scrutiny, and it still is the foundational bedrock for our scientific understanding of gravitational physics at the macro level. Quantum mechanics is trying to unlock the secrets of the micro world which – at least superficially – appear to be contradictory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cool stuff. This is what makes a book like Hawking’s so good. It raises questions and stimulates rational thought. Religion, on the other hand, proposes the answers to all questions first, “God”, and then goes about bending and twisting all over the fucking place to “prove” “God” is, indeed, the right and only answer to….whatever you need to know. I’ve got a documentary series with Hawking called “Into The Universe” where he discusses all sorts of cool shit: aliens, time travel, etc. You can probably find it on YouTube, I’d imagine. Benedict Cumberbatch and Hawking, with his computer voice, narrate the series. Smart, fun stuff, like “A Brief History of Time.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pretty sure I’ve seen it. I gobble that kind of stuff up. “A Brief History of Time” was great!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, you can say that about the book. And what is more interesting is he adjusts his views with new evidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely. He used to think he, or someone, would be able to solidly find a “theory of everything” that would kinda wrap up all branches of scientific knowledge into one, cohesive theory. Later in life, he realized that he would not be able to do that and didn’t believe anyone else would be able to either. He saw this as a good thing because now we can keep on learning and striving to learn more indefinitely. Not knowing everything was inspirational and uplifting and reaffirming to him. Religious nutters, on the other hand, assume they know everything there is to know already and become vitriolic and rageful when doubted. Very big difference there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
God ticks all the boxes. Why is a tree tall. God made it so. The theist would not want to disturb this balance of things.
A unified theory of everything would be quite something especially if it would be presented in such a way that non specialists can understand it.
LikeLike
Indeed. I can’t say I understand it or what it would be myself. I just know it was something Hawking was deeply involved with. The movie based on his life is called “Theory of Everything.” It’s quite good, too.
LikeLike
That movie was really good. Did you watch the one about Turing? They came out I think almost at the same time.
LikeLike
Do you remember the name? I’m not sure, but if not, I’d like to.
LikeLike
The Imitation Game
LikeLike
Yes, I saw it. Excellent.
LikeLike
So our travel into the past will belong to the alternate histories hypothesis, interesting, when you think of all the possibilities.
What you say about these type of questions is really true. You want to ask more questions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can try to answer the last question only:
https://professionallessons.blog/2019/04/23/five-professional-lessons-from-einsteins-scientific-career/
LikeLike