I said somewhere I am reading Zola’s the earth. It’s such a work!
Somewhere he writes
Is misfortune ever at an end? This universal suffrage, now, it don’t bring meat to the pot, does it? The land tax weighs us down, they keep on taking our children to fight. It’s not a bit of use having revolutions, it’s six of one and half a dozen of the other, and a peasant always remains a peasant.
And for some reason, this would almost reflect the situation of the poor in Kenya. First, the concern of most people is food. I would call it the politics of food. In place of land tax, I would name the many varied taxes the thieving government imposes on the working classes. And maybe, one would almost conclude elections don’t help us. The poor almost always remain poor.
Some of you mat have seen this before, I hadn’t. Maybe next we have official business and someone is intent on invocations, I should try something if the kind.
It’s that time of the year when most Christians around the world celebrate one of the most important events in the Christian calender. Even Paul said if Christ is not risen then their faith is in vain.
It is with this in mind that I present to you this dialogue concerning the risen Christ.
Hope you enjoy it.
Happy irreverent Sunday everyone.
Religion is what guys turn to. And here, people in Venezuela are hoping god will come through for them and restore power, water and food lines.
and the US supreme Court
If there is a reason to participate actively in elections, this must be one of them for the president will appoint judges who will outlive his term
Should a rich parent share out their wealth to the progeny when they are still alive or should they sell it and enjoy the proceeds while they still live and let the children fend for themselves?
This is the question presented to us in The Earth by Emile Zola when the Fouans decide to partition the land they own to their children; two sons and a daughter. The elder sister, Le Grande, widowed and mean, advices the younger brother intent on dividing his land to his children not to do it that he will shortly become a beggar. The brother at this point in time is not able to till the land and would not want to see it lie fallow for he has lived all his life working the land. For Le Grande, strangers would rather take the land than she partition it out to her children.
What’s your take?
And a bonus question, are children owed an inheritance from the labour of their parents? All of it or are parents at liberty to dispose of their assets as they see fit?