A month or so ago I wrote a post as a response to an article that had appeared in The Elephant that had been authored by a friend of mine. I shared with my friend my response and he has now penned his response and shared with me. In this post I would like to briefly respond to some of the questions he raises and clarify my position where it wasn’t clear.
My friend says he has met many an avid atheists who in their sunset days begin to talk about god as supporting Platinga’s assertion that there is a god-shaped vacuum in human hearts. First I want to agree with him that it is impossible to settle this matter one way or the other here. Having said that, I want to add that the claim that avid atheists have turned to god in their sunset years doesn’t add any validity to the claims of the religious about the existence of gods or supernatural beings. This claim was made against Antony Flew, Voltaire and others and so it is one to take with a pinch of salt. My friend says
While Makagutu states that I made an argument about “the God-shaped vacuum”, I only made a statement about it, and there is a vast difference between a statement and an argument.
but I did no such thing. This is what I wrote
The argument that we all have a god shaped hole is not only weak but it is also evidently false. Platinga didn’t offer any demonstrations for it. Nor did Augustine. They just threw it out there hoping it will stick.
Clearly, I wasn’t referring to my good friend’s statement but to the argument generally.
On the question of whether these people read their bibles, I will only say we stand on very opposite sides of the question. My friend believes the bible
I believe that “All Scripture [the Holy Bible] is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work
A position I don’t hold and which I don’t think is open to determination.
To this
Makagutu’s response to my answer to my second question, namely, whether there is any difference between political and religious fanaticism, is unclear, so I hope he will make it clear in due course
my answer then and now was that there is no difference between religious and political fanaticism. Both, usually are adopted without reflection and justified post facto.
I find the suggestion that self regulation would help avoid such fanaticism and incidents like we continue to witness in Shakahola to be unrealistic. My friend thinks it can work. There is no more to say to it. He says I have engaged in ad hominem by referring to his position as an academic and claiming that there are expectations I (we) have of a person in his place. My apologies. I am however not sure whether that makes the claim fallacious. No need to distract from the argument. In deed, I agree with the good doc that to have written that is to expect him to think as I do. I don’t think to make a suggestion that so and so should have said or done such and such is an act of intolerance. It is something we do all the time with no ill intent.
Have a happy Sunday everyone.