The state has no right to put to death, even for the sake of making an example, anyone whom it can leave alive without danger.
Social contract by JJR
An Inclusive Site Dedicated to Life-Long Learning
Any thoughts worth writing about
On the lookout for more joy
Observations and reflectionsf
You - philosophical, thoughtful, witty. Me - still thinks fart jokes are funny. We should DEFINITELY get together!
Questioning the conventional wisdom
Everything random... At 3am 😊
These are unedited versions of my thoughts straight from the mind, a relieve from the ‘pressure cooker’, snippets and flotsam of a mundane existence, collected over time, at the early morning hours at sunrise. I have no intensions to start a self-help group or a forum for complains!
Blossoming: A Story of Beauty, Pain, Struggle & Growth
The African Environmental Blog site
The world inside my head is beautiful 🌷🌷
Videos of feral cats on the streets, and my own four feral felines at home, feline humor, advice, and gifts for your cat.
My journey to finding love through the sea Fuckboys
A blog by the Global Governance Centre, Graduate Institute, Geneva
Nicole
Cogito Ergo Sum
Sustainable Living & Wildlife Conservation
Where The Eagles Fly . . . . Art Science Poetry Music & Ideas
One minute info blogs escaping the faith trap
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t…
Mark and Abbie Jury
Life is intuition woven on fickleness.
Life is a journey. Let us meet at the intersection and share a story.
Random musings about everything.
With(out) Predicates
I call architecture frozen music. – Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Couldn’t agree more with that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, who’s JJR?
LikeLike
Jean jacques rousseau
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right. Thanks. And may your first child, be a masculine child. 🙂
LikeLike
– Luca Brasi (The Godfather)
LikeLike
Bingo!
LikeLiked by 1 person
hahahaha, I prefer feminine 😛
LikeLike
Then may your second child be a feminine child.
LikeLike
hahaha
LikeLike
An enlightening historical figure, isn’t he?
LikeLike
he is
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh dear, I fear I shall have to re-read SC to catch up with you.
As an aside, I can never understand why religious people support it. Isn’t life and death the responsibility of their gods, not something for mere people to meddle with?
LikeLike
I guess the religious support it because they are hastening the eternal punishment of the offender.
I actually started reading this on your prompting- you wrote some quote from the book a while back. I have paused the Confessions to be resumed when I finish this.
LikeLike
Noel — have you seen this yet? Welcome to America.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/11/20/3594902/utah-lawmakers-advance-bill-to-bring-back-firing-squads/
LikeLike
Unf**kin’ real! 2015 in America: a nation that greatly deludes itself into believing it is a world leader in moral and ethical values. Bullsh*t. Another excellent link, Victoria, not a pleasant one, but very informative. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jeff. I try to stay abreast of the medieval goings on that continues to be prevalent in our country. These asshats actually think this is more humane. UFB is right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Too bad the NRA would never follow in the drug companies’ foot steps and make less bullets and guns so execution by firing squad would be harder and harder to carry out. If the U.S. gov’t wants to continue this barbaric practice, it should have to be carried out manually by a member of congress being made to execute prisoners by choking them to death with one hand. Let them get up and close for a nice long choking execution while they’re forced to stare the condemned in the eyes whilst doing it. I’ve a feeling execution would be taken off the table then. It’s so much easier and impersonal to do it from a distance.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yep. They clearly tell on themselves, They appear to perceive and think primarily from their hindbrain — which is about as primitive as you can get.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. They’re clearly thinking with their “behind” parts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL
LikeLike
I so like this proposal. I think this would make them rethink the death penalty. Maybe a judge should be asked to do it or better still the family that thinks justice will be served when the person is killed
LikeLike
i think there is a lot of medieval goings on in your country. The latest I heard is a mother who burns her children books if they depict dinosaurs.
LikeLike
Well then, I guess you’re heard about the movement “Christians Against Dinosaurs”.
The video is not a joke/hoax. UFB
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/irate-christian-parent-i-am-getting-sick-and-tired-of-dinosaurs-being-forced-on-our-children/
LikeLike
Yeah, I couldn’t recall the name of the group. I love the things that come out of America lo
LikeLike
OMG!!!! Bat-shit crazy!
LikeLike
Seriously, right? You can’t make this chit up.
LikeLike
No kidding. If you made it up, no one would believe you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL — What planet have you been on? 😀
LikeLike
Not sure, but it was kinda blue and smelled like huckleberries. Wasn’t too bad, ‘cept fer the skeeters! As big as bats they was. Glad I’m back. 🙂
LikeLike
Wondered where you had moved to … 😉
LikeLike
LOL — well, I now technically live in a 3rd World country. Mississippi.
Don’t ask.
LikeLike
‘Progress of a maturing society’? Yeah. Right.
Problem obtaining lethal drugs? Don’t kill people? Oh no, can’t possibly let them off to live a life at the taxpayers expense.
LikeLike
i think they mean retrogression in a decaying society
LikeLike
Eeek… Why stop there? Let’s go with public stonings! 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
😦
LikeLike
Great idea! The NRA and the Republican Party can then become huge supporters of stone quarry workers to help bump up their pay. Here’s the motto: “Every Time You Stone A Criminal You’re Putting $ In The Pocket Of A Stone Quarry Worker.”
LikeLike
Nice, and as Gary North says, stoning is a game everyone can play.
LikeLike
Can’t get more rational than that. I say, “Stone the bastards!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I’ll eat Gary North after I have my atheist/cannibal pals stone him to death first. See, the stoning helps to tenderize the meat before you cook it. DELICIOUS!!!! I’ll include the recipe for this in my new ” Atheist Re-constructionist Cookbook”. I’ll send you a copy when it’s done. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
i can’t wait for a copy of this book
LikeLike
why do I have a feeling Gary North wouldn’t hesitate to be at the fore front in the stoning squad. He sure belongs to the middle east where stoning or cutting off hands is the modus operandi
LikeLike
He must be giddy with excitement watching ISIS.
LikeLike
Too bad we couldn’t turn Gary North over to ISIS to be stoned. We’d be rid of him, and he’d get to experience a guiltless form of execution as it’s carried out on him. Two good deeds with one act.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh dear me, I can picture it now.
LikeLike
Right? Sad thing is, it isn’t that hard to picture.
LikeLike
I could join them, I used to throw stones as a hobby when I was young. Now I will be doing it for profit
LikeLike
You’re a shoe-in then. 🙂
LikeLike
i may even train some how to take aim
LikeLike
That’s cause yer such a nice bloke. 🙂
LikeLike
Colorado-lots of stoned in public 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bless them!
LikeLike
haha you say that until you’re stuck behind em I traffic lol. Jesus lord, drive already dudes!
LikeLike
All in good time, Madam, all in good time. We have to let the ducks pass, don’t we? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Public stoning it is
LikeLike
Wohoo!
LikeLike
am joining Gary North. His logic is flawless
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think this is just absurd. In this day and age, really!
LikeLike
Oh, sorry to be a -humanist- party popper -again-, but anyone around have personally had any relatives, adults or children, viciously raped, mutilated, and/or savagely murdered by some of those you so kindly defend, from an otherwise understandable attitude of human compassion?
You see I personally know people who, for example, have been stubborn anti-abortionists until the day they had to choose themselves between a hopeless, damaged pregnancy, and the life of their spouses at an increasing risk as the pregnancy was developing into an irreversible, life threatening medical disaster…
Everything changes when activism becomes a matter of personal loss.
As for JJR, I’ve always had a bit of a problem with him: “When Rousseau subsequently became celebrated as a theorist of education and child-rearing, his abandonment of his children was used by his critics, including Voltaire and Edmund Burke, as the basis for ad hominem attacks.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. I still do not support the death penalty. If I supported the killing of the perpetrator, I would be no better than he, no matter how calm the death would be.
LikeLike
No, no, my question was “…anyone around had any…”?
If you didn’t, your opinion -to which you are absolutely entitled- is nevertheless irrelevant, since your degree of understanding of the issue is purely reason shaped, without the ability to genuinely identity with the matter.
LikeLike
I suppose I still don’t understand what you’re getting at. People who have never had such an experience only have reason to form their opinion with, that isn’t a bad thing. People who have those experiences understand the emotions, but that is not necessarily the best way to form an opinion.
There are people with and without said experiences that are on either side of the issue. Given that, I think reason is our best tool.
LikeLike
You see, most of the time those in charge with taking decisions, have either reason, or emotions only…
I don’t blame you for not understanding what I am trying to get at, since you probably -and hopefully- lack the emotional load.
Reason IS the best tool, but only when all pre-requisites are in place, subjective and objective. Justice is a complex system of reasoning which consideres, or should consider both.
In my opinion the capital punishment is the just retribution for the proven, criminally deliberate termination of a human life. It has nothing to do with how society “feels” about it, nor it should have.
Murder is a act which places its perpetrator beyond the boundaries of ethical expectations.
It is an act of sadism to force the families of the victims to pay through their taxes for the prison comfort and life long welfare of their loved ones’ murderer.
LikeLike
You seem at odds with yourself. Either justice should take emotion into account or it shouldn’t. We can’t have it both ways.
What is capital punishment if not deliberate termination of human life? I don’t see how it can be argued that the reason for the murder makes it any less unethical and wrong. If anything, putting someone to death that has been neutralized by imprisionment is even less ethical than other murders.
Would you stop supporting capital punishment if there was a way to insure that victims’ tax money didn’t go to the prision system?
LikeLike
You misunderstood. It is probably my British English mixed into the sintactic mess caused by the rest of languages competing for my thoughts…
Justice does, and should take into account the victim’s side’s emotions. Pure reason is objective only, but contrary to the general acceptance, it is not enough to make decisions where the emotional load of personal lose -as in the case of victims’ families- is involved. Your evaluation of the system is objective only, placing the perpetrator’s life on the same side with the victim’s, which is both morally and ethically wrong.
And please read and reflect all my words when argumenting. I wrote “criminal deliberate”, which makes the intent diametrically opposed to deliberate only.
The carrying out of an act of justice is not a crime.
I have a suggestion, why don’t you people against capital punishment ask for these criminals to be placed into your custody, just to grow yourselves an idea of who they really are?
LikeLike
My evaluation is not objective only. I have experience with one of the things you mentioned in your original comment.
The reason I did not zone in on ‘criminal’ is because laws change. Right now, capital punishment is legal in some places and illegal in others. What is criminal depends on whose borders you find yourself in.
What they really are is human, perhaps heinous humans, but their disgusting acts do not justify further disgusting acts. Sanctioned murder is still murder.
LikeLike
Your forgiving spirit deserves my utmost appreciation, even though I have to respectfully disagree with you.
I agree also to the fact that murder is murder, but unfortunately as necessary as a justified amputation of a cancerous or septic limb, on which all other medical procedures have failed. Leaving such a limb out of moral or ethical reasons shall cause the slow and painful death of the individual. Convicted murderers are a slow, septic cancer of society, draining away resources which could be used for better purposes. It is disgusting to see that governments cut back on research and treatment of terminally ill children, while these horrendous parasites are granted taxpayer funded cosmetic surgeries, university education etc.
Is this correct?
Is it corect for the infamous Norwegian mass murderer to be allowed to sue the Norwegian state because his solitary confinement breaches his human rights! 77 young people murdered in cold blood by this human excrement! Please take a look as his “smile” and imagine the families of all those 77 people being forced to look at it: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/11406616/Mass-murderer-Breivik-to-sue-Norway-over-prison-conditions.html
LikeLike
Well, I think respectful disagreement is the best we are going to do here. Have a lovely day. 🙂
LikeLike
And you:-))
LikeLike
I think I agree
LikeLike
yes I have. the assailants’ deaths won’t turn back time or erase what’s happened. they’re off the street. we’ve moved on. no death penalty required.
would we be sad if these criminals died? no. but we aren’t better people because we advocate for it.
LikeLike
Your suffering demands utter respect.
And yes, we aren’t “better” people by advocating for the death penalty.
But, in my opinion, advocating it doesn’t make anyone”worse” which is oftentimes the outcome of demonising the advocates of it.
For me, it is a matter of correct justice.
LikeLike
I do understand that, plenty of jerks I’d like to whack with a bat. For me, justice has just always been not letting someone else’s deficiency become mine; but I get that’s not for everyone. My mom is the biggest pacifist I know, but she’s not against seeing someone heinous get the same treatment in return. Much peace to you friend.
LikeLike
Thank you from the heart.
LikeLike
On JJR abandoning his children, he writes about it a lot in the confessions. He doesn’t run away from it. I like the confessions which I haven’t finished reading as yet, but he tells the reader to judge him as he wishes, he does his best to present himself as he really is.
As to capital punishment, I honestly haven’t had a personal experience which such inhumane acts and I wouldn’t wish it even for my enemy. I just don’t think hanging them is the best way forward.
LikeLike
I fully agree, it’s not the best, just unfortunately necessary…
As for JJR, I care less about how sincere he is, I just judge him according to what he did, not what he wrote. The world sucks because of two groups of people: the ones who think theoretical rationalizing without practical experience is enough, and the ones who think practical experience without theoretical knowledge might be also enough.
The saddest thing is that the vast majority of politicians belong to either one, or the other category.
LikeLike
how do we bridge the gap of experience and that of theory?
LikeLike
No decision-making should be permitted without proper theoretical credentials, reinforced by practical experience.
It’s paradoxical to notice that every job/profession requires both from an applicant, except that of a politician.
I guess this is why a PhD, which is largely theoretical, requires nevertheless peer reviewed publications, which provides the author with the practical experience given by years of research and writing.
LikeLike
here is where I have a small problem especially in the question at hand.
how would such matters be adjudicated? would we require judges to have had personal experience with gruesome crimes or where will they get the practical experience?
LikeLike
Judges and lawyers for example must spend a reasonable amount of time as assistants exactly in order to gain such experience, before going full as doctors of law.
LikeLike
For comparison purposes, these videos explain the Nordic corrections and policing system:
LikeLike
Ron! I’ve been wondering where you had gotten to.
LikeLike
I have often wondered – if we gave convicted felons the choice between a lifetime of jail or death, how many of them would choose death?
LikeLike
I ask the same question of Republicans. Either response would be fine by me, as long as they’re kept away from decent humans. 🙂
LikeLike
i think few of them would opt to kill themselves but many would opt to live hoping that someday they might be released
LikeLike
Pennsylvania looking to end the death penalty
LikeLike
i think that is the way to go.
LikeLike
Noel–is there capital punishment where you are?
LikeLike
in the statute books yes but the last execution was in 87 or 89. We haven’t hanged anyone since then though the police do their best at extra judicial killings
LikeLike
Well, at least they’re good at something, eh?
LikeLike
good news and bad news I suppose.
LikeLike
Agreed! 🙂
LikeLike